Service Alert
1. Ask a clear clinical question
2. Acquire best available evidence
3. Appraise evidence for quality
4. Apply evidence to practice
5. Assess the outcomes
Level of Evidence Pyramid
Level One: Systematic Reviews or Meta-analysis | A systematic review summarizes the results of available carefully designed healthcare studies (controlled trials) and provides a high level of evidence on the effectiveness of healthcare interventions. Judgments may be made about the evidence and inform recommendations for healthcare. |
Level Two: Randomized Controlled Trials |
A study in which people are allocated at random (by chance alone) to receive one of several clinical interventions. One of these interventions is the standard of comparison or control.The control may be a standard practice, a placebo ("sugar pill"), or no intervention at all. |
Level Three: Cohort Study |
A type of medical research used to investigate the causes of disease, establishing links between risk factors and health outcomes. Cohort Studies are usually forward-looking - that is, they are "prospective" studies planned in advance and carried out over a future period of time. |
Level Four: Case-Control Study |
A study that compares patients who have a disease or outcome of interest (cases) with patients who do not have the disease or outcome (controls), and looks back retrospectively to compare how frequently the exposure to a risk factor is present in each group to determine the relationship between the risk factor and the disease. |
Level Five: Case Reports, Case Series | Case reports are considered the lowest level of evidence, but they are also the first line of evidence, because they are where new issues and ideas emerge. This is why they are towards the base of our pyramid. A good case report will be clear about the importance of the observation being reported. |
Level Six: Editorials, Expert Opinion | Recommendations from persons with established expertise in a specific clinical area usually based on clinical experience. Not considered a research method because critical inquiry is lacking. |
QUESTION | PRIMARY RESEARCH |
SYNTHESIZED RESEARCH (Secondary Sources) |
DATABASE |
Therapy |
Randomized Controlled Trials Controlled Trials |
Systematic Reviews |
PubMed (P,S) |
Prevention How Can I prevent this problem? |
Randomized Controlled Trials Controlled Trials |
Systematic Reviews | PubMed (P,S) MedlinePlus (S) ClinicalTrials.gov (P) CochraneLibrary(S) ProQuest Nursing (S) CINAHL (S) |
Diagnosis/Assessment What is the best way to asses or best diagnostic test for this patient? |
Instrument Development Research | PubMed (P,S) ClinicalTrials.gov (P) |
|
Causation What causes this problem? |
Cohort Study |
Systematic Reviews |
PubMed (P,S) |
Prognosis |
Cohort Study |
Systematic Reviews | PubMed (P,S) MedlinePlus (S) ClinicalTrials.gov (P) CochraneLibrary(S) ProQuest Nursing (S) CINAHL (S) |
Meaning |
Qualitative Study | Systematic Reviews | PubMed (P,S) MedlinePlus (S) ClinicalTrials.gov (P) CochraneLibrary(S) ProQuest Nursing (S) CINAHL (S) |